| It's
that time of year when I settle down to do taxes and, like many
people, I try to find a quiet place so I won't be disturbed. With
three teen-agers in the house, though, finding solitude can be as
difficult as finding simplicity in the tax code. But that's another
article. Of more importance is the beginning of the 2001 Virginia
General Assembly and its approach to taxing and spending.
Gov. Jim Gilmore was swept into office in 1997 promising to end
the hated car tax in five years. To date, he has - with the help
of a booming economy and big tax surpluses - delivered on the promise.
His plan would have folks paying only 30 percent of the car tax
on the first $20,000 of a vehicle's assessed value next year, with
the tax being eliminated in 2002. But economic growth is projected
to be 3.2 percent - less than the level necessary to trigger the
next phase of the tax reduction. So the governor will have to find
other sources of revenue to complete his pledge. A plan to use money
from the tobacco settlement was scuttled by the Senate Finance Committee
this week, so the search continues.
In essence,
the governor - in trying to find money for a political promise that
is greatly complicated by a slowing economy - finds himself in a
budgetary kabuki dance with legislative partners who are fearful
of having their appropriations feet trampled.
How did we get in this mess? By embracing wildly optimistic surplus
projections while increasing spending a whopping 33 percent in the
past three years (with inflation at only 2 percent per year). In
1997, Virginia's biennial budget was $36 billion. Today, that figure
has grown to $48 billion - a $12 billion increase. "But haven't
we received tax cuts," one might ask? Car tax relief so far
has totaled $447 million. The 0.5 percent food tax cut in 1999 was
$60 million. When all tax cuts are finally implemented, they will
amount to $1.6 billion - a mere 13.3 percent of the increase in
spending. Conclusion? State spending is out of control and we need
to do something about it.
What may be
most sad is that the people who ran on cutting taxes now want to
increase taxes to pay for their profligate spending. Sen. Chuck
Colgan, D-Manassas, has proposed a 1.5-cent increase in the sales
tax to pay for the elimination of the car tax, an action that could
have been easily realized had the legislature not let spending spin
out of control. Delegate Harry Parrish, R-Manassas, has said he
would support similar legislation while Delegate Jack Rollison,
R-Woodbridge, has declared that he will seek a half-cent increase
in the sales tax for Northern Virginia to support transportation
projects. If these gentlemen have their way, Northern Virginians
will pay almost 50 percent more in sales taxes - a two cent increase
from the current 4.5 percent. This could have been avoided had our
legislature not gone on a spending binge. Under the guise of cutting
taxes, lawmakers have created the conditions for bigger government
and more tax increases. I wonder what they expect us to cut in our
family budget to pay for their increases?
Gov. Gilmore
is worried and is already suggesting an across-the-board 3 percent
cut in spending. But the damage has already been done. The surplus
is spent. Moreover, those of us who understand that a government
big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take
everything you've got are disenchanted with politicians who won't
live up to their promise to reduce the tax burden. Federal, state
and local taxes on a two-wage family with a median income now claim
37.6 percent of earnings, and lawmakers do not look as if they plan
to do anything to improve the situation.
Isn't it time we got serious about holding our leaders to their
promises by reminding them that, one, increased taxing and spending
creates an ever-growing population that makes claims on the largesse
of government and, two, promising to reduce taxes while increasing
spending is truly a fraud.
In business,
it's a crime to offer attractive prices for out-of-stock products
simply to entice the person to buy in-stock items for more money.
It's called "bait and switch." Our elected leaders are
no less ignoble when they promise tax cuts - and even deliver modest
ones - only to explode spending in the same motion. The word oppressive
comes to mind, but I can't think about that now - my teens are making
too much noise. But readers who do have some thoughts on the subject
can let their legislators know about them by visiting the General
Assembly's Web site at http://legis.state.va.us/vaonline/v.htm.
L. Scott Lingamfelter
lives with his family in Lake Ridge |